idk their names. its not both of their faults its the big guy. plinketts fault. the skinny dude pointed out that she DID renounce her wish when walking away and plinkett said no.
god, Mike, you're STILL getting things wrong. 1. The armor didn't come from a Asteria's fight _on_ the island. It was a fight to let the Amazons _escape to_ the island -- to the boats, actually. 2. Diana talks about trying to find Asteria and Diana directly found the armor. The armor wasn't "shipped to her" anonymously and for no reason, as you said here. 3. You still didn't deal with when you said that you don't recall that it was implied Diana raped the man whose body they've stolen. You were out of the room again when Diana and proxy-Steve woke up in bed naked together, which is one of _the_ Hollywood visual euphemisms for "we just had sex." Do us a favor and actually watch the movie. Do the job you're paid for, and watch the movie. Or refund your patreons, because you're not doing the job. You may even find you can write a more coherent review, because what you did the first time around stinks. For example: it's obvious that Diana would not have knowledge of Kristen Wiig getting her wish updated, so the armor makes no sense in any context that's actually given. At best they could imply that she gets her powers back slowly, just like she lost them, or the armor was originally meant for Max Lord, but the wing parts getting bent out of shape made them nonfunctional, and that's one reason she'd ditch them. Except they made the movie crescendo. Clearly there was retro-active editing and sound mixing. This is the director/writer not making up her damn mind. They just wanted the armor to set up and remind, and pay off the stinger, and that's it, and they didn't care about how they did it. that's a doable hypothesis, ain't it? And that's how you could've done a review. But all we got was, "wha? I missed it? this thing didn't happen (except it did you fucking idiot), so it doesn't make sense. OK next thing that I didn't get because of my own incompetence. Don't ever bash cinema sins, mike, now or in the future, and I hope you never have, because that was a cinema sins episode that you did.
WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! WE NEED MR. PLINKETT'S WW'84 REVIEW!!! P L E A S EEEEEEEEEEEE ! ! ! ! ! ! 😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫😫 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
But also, she goes flying for several minutes... away from Washington... only to fly back to Washington to get the armour, even though she had no idea what she was up against other than guys with guns, which she has shown to be more than capable of defeating. She had no idea about Cheetah at this stage. Also, why not just make herself invisible?
What? I didn't know _The Blob (1988)_ was such a terrible film with excessive and loud CGI! Oh, my mistake. It's a great horror film! I also didn't see the poster. I got distracted by some new CGI pile of crap horror on the screen when you all were doing _re:View._ Sorry!
Good job. Look guys, you don't have to force yourself to watch this dogshit. Just toss it in as a 3-minute discussion in a roundup video, and spend your time (and ours) on things worth talking about.
I never want movie theaters to close, such a different experience than the best widescreen, stereo TV. Want no slobs? Go to week day matinees., I do all the time, whole rows to yourself. Plus I have an Alamo Drafthouse near me, they know how to handle slobs.
Yeah I wouldn't have been able to tell you anything about this "movie" either. I would've been bored in the first 30 minutes and started looking around my living room for stuff to clean. You guys are awesome for sitting through bloated, CGI loaded garbage like this. I wouldn't have been able to do it.
I have watch back to the future, ghostbusters 1 and 2, and even the first avengers movie a few times, but even if i watched it once or twice, i would still be able to remember and call out scenes without looking at the scenes again, a good movie is memorable a boring movie is forgettable period.
Whenever the hell you clowns release your re:View for the The Blob (1988) i will be waiting. It is damn near perfect in every way. It is The Fly, It is Robocop, It is.....Tremors....Beaches.
You know, I can totally imagine myself potentially paying an amount like $50 to stream a new movie. I understand the idea of splitting it with a limited number of friends who are willing to split and watch in silence with the right people who are properly behaved during a movie. All those benefits like being able to pause appeal to me as well. The only major holdback I have for trying this model is because of the pandemic, so what's the point of paying $50 for a movie only you a few others get to watch? You make it a private event with likeminded people. You don't have to contend with anyone you don't like which is entirely different from the current cinematic experience. I think this would solve a lot of problems.
Problem with mainstream audience hating this movie they just want wonder woman to be female Captain America. They dont want any silly comicbook villain from her comics in her movie or anything in it remotely silly from her mythology or comics in it either like her invisible jet. I actually like the sillier aspects of comics unlike mainstream audiences. Hate to tell these fans but most of wondy's villains are from greek mythology and cheetah is one of her villains to. Lex Luthor was written to be a trump type character in dc comics years ago so i dont understand the mainstream audiences complaints. The mainstream audience are hypocrites. They have no problem with Thomas Wayne being depicted as a trump type character in the joker movie but have a huge problem in WW 1984 when the main Male villain is a trump type character also? Hypocrites
Its confusing but I think I got it, cheetah was the apex predator wish, so diana had to wear the armor against the beast, even if she had her powers back (she would be equal in power only against a fight against minerva first wish, which was to become wonder woman).
I really enjoyed WW84. My wife and I went out and saw it twice at a drive-in over Christmas weekend. I really liked it the first time we saw it and enjoyed it even more the second time. I liked that Wonder Woman spent a lot of effort to save people rather than just beating up bad guys. And I liked that she talked the big bad down rather than it ending in a big punch fight. Nice change of pace.
What dystopian hellscape movie theaters are they going to in Wiscounsin? I cant count like, on my hands every time someones been so annoying in a theater that i actually noticed. Not saying their wrong, mostly just genuinely curious if there's a regional difference or something.
That scene where she rolls over the road at high speed and impact and I'm supposed to believe those kids were ok, she literally landed on them between her and the road rolls over with them, but don't worry those kids didn't get a scratch. It really just didn't have the feel of the first but I thought the first was a little overrated tbh, still good but amazing, this one just felt a bit bland and the story was boring.
My top 10 movies from the 80s and 90s 1- Forest Gump 2- Shawshank Redemption 3- Basic Instinct 4- Official and Gentleman 5- Fatal Attraction 6- Silence of the Lambs 7- Carlitos Way 8- The Godfather 9- Heat 10- Taxi Driver
Their version of renouncing the wish would have been so much better, it would have added weight and tension to the last fight as it could have been Diana trying to tire out Cheetah person so she didn't have to renounce her wish, then realising as the fight went on that it was taking to long or wasn't going to work at all so eventually she was forced to renounce the wish to save the world, then giving the fight a dramatic turn point. Instead the renouncing didn't carry that much weight and the fight didn't carry that much weight.
I heard from another video that ambiguity is a way for filmmakers to communicate to an audience that something doesn't matter. It was Folding Ideas' video on the movie Annihilation. The tattoo could have been normal or it could have been created by the Shimmer, but that doesn't matter, what matters is the way it has become a symbol during the events of the movie. The origin of the tattoo is deliberately left ambiguous. But ambiguity in big commercial modern movies is just a way for filmmakers to not give a shit. There is no theme to communicate, there is no deeper meaning. Different directors or actors or editors or music composers are just throwing a bunch of ideas together, copying other movies that made money. Ambiguity comes about when some of those artists foolishly try to accomplish a deeper theme and other artists contradict it because they didn't notice.
Unrelated...but anyone know a legitimate way to buy SpaceCop on Blueray? I Googled it but mostly got outdated links and Ebay auctions... Help a brotha out?
First they have the courage to even face this trash to begin with. Then, the integrity to admit how little they could actually tolerate. Redlettermedia becoming a standard for ethics? *Whew* Rough year...
I give RLM full credit for being able to maintain enough interest just to critique the film. If the writers couldn't be bothered to write a coherent story and to properly develop the characters why should the audience, or especially the critics care?
I don't think that "the movie just didn't catch my attention" is an excuse to claim nonexistent plot holes. I will never watch Ford v Ferrari. I tried, and it bored me to death because the topic doesn't interest me. But I'm not going to say it's a bad movie or claim that there's plot holes because I wasn't paying attention.
